Hejsan allesammans.
Jag va o surfa runt på Toms hemsida och läste det hära ..
CMS is likely preciptating, the TMG has a different chelator(DTPH) and should be better(stronger bonding complex).
You can try Flourish if you want........ but I bet it'll do the same thing if not worse. It has a very weak chelator.
While softer water will behave somewhat differently, this issue with the traces is the main fertilizer difference.
But we have several chelators/products available to address these issues, so we can put them to good use.
Even in soft water, TMG does very well.
There is an arguement that iron that is a little harder to get a hold of but always there for the plants is better than highly available iron that's only there for an hour or so after you dose.
Nu är det ju inte NutriSI han jämför med och därför undrar jag nu om det är någon skillnad på TMG kontra NutriSI
(annat än den kollosala skillnaden i pris , samt att man får dosera flera ämnen som NutriSI inte har)
MVH Jimmy
Jag va o surfa runt på Toms hemsida och läste det hära ..
CMS is likely preciptating, the TMG has a different chelator(DTPH) and should be better(stronger bonding complex).
You can try Flourish if you want........ but I bet it'll do the same thing if not worse. It has a very weak chelator.
While softer water will behave somewhat differently, this issue with the traces is the main fertilizer difference.
But we have several chelators/products available to address these issues, so we can put them to good use.
Even in soft water, TMG does very well.
There is an arguement that iron that is a little harder to get a hold of but always there for the plants is better than highly available iron that's only there for an hour or so after you dose.
Nu är det ju inte NutriSI han jämför med och därför undrar jag nu om det är någon skillnad på TMG kontra NutriSI
(annat än den kollosala skillnaden i pris , samt att man får dosera flera ämnen som NutriSI inte har)
MVH Jimmy
Kommentar